Language-bearers

In the earliest poem written in Old English, The Dream of the Rood, people are called “language bearers”. It is an intriguing descriptor-name, highlighting one of the unique characteristics of what it means to be human. While watching the new BBC series Human, I was reminded of this defining feature of our distinctiveness. Presenter Ella Al-Shamahi visited a cave in Botswana to make the case that the appearance of the first humans (who share an identity with us) was marked by the development of ritual. Behaviour that implies abstract thoughts and patterns, rendered material through actions that serve no immediate practical benefit.

However, while it may be the evidence of something, ritual must always follow in the wake of something else: the creation of story. Ritual is secondary; stories are primary. As human beings grappled to locate themselves under the stars, and at risk from the vagaries of the weather and nature, stories endow a sense of purpose in survival. We envisage a future, and that future shapes and influences our present actions. Stories also bind us together with those who share the same framework of meaning. It is for this reason that I have long thought of the book Genesis, not so much an account of creation, but as an act of creation. Sharing these particular stories meant you were knit together with the children of Israel, and shared their covenant with God. The story is the fabric that holds the people together and ritual develops out of the narratives to help anchor them within human experience. It may also be true that as stories are embedded in ritual, the act of creativity also shapes the way that the story is told.

At Helleristningene ved Sagelva, in Norway, this is one of two raindeer images ground into the rocks. They are approximately 9,000 years old.

In the way that time is so much greater than we imagine, the script of Humans reminds us that in the entire period that human beings have been around, writing has been present only for the last 1% of our history. It follows that tracing the origins of stories is an impossible task, with the evidence of ritual standing proxy for story’s presence and purpose. Very often we can only speculate about the narratives that lie behind these illustrations, or their purpose once completed. Given the harsh conditions in which early people lived, and the precious nature of resources (including time) needed to survive, the commitment to art and the creation of enduring heritage is surprising. Human being appear to have needed theologies and mythologies that wove experiences into a sense of purpose and blessing.

The poet Eamon Grennan wonders if the cave painters worked in silence, like monks illuminating Medieval manuscripts, or if they kept up a gossip of religious fervour as they created images of wonder in the given contours of rock:

It doesn’t matter: we know
they went with guttering rushlight
into the dark; came to terms
with the given world; must have had
—as their hands moved steadily
by spiderlight—one desire
we’d recognise: they would—before going on   
beyond this border zone, this nowhere   
that is now here—leave something
upright and bright behind them in the dark.

Extract from The Cave Painters by Eamon Grennan

  • The image at the head of this blog is sometimes described as ‘Viking graffiti’ and can be found in Skipwith Church, near York.

Faith and the City

My grandfather would not have approved. A former church warden of a large market-town parish church, he voted Tory at every opportunity, and would have seen the Church’s critical examination of urban life – Faith in the City – as the latest example of its waywardness. Every day he awaited the arrival of his copy of The Daily Mail, which he embraced as a comfort blanket for all his favourite prejudices. He waved the paper at me energetically when it earnestly condemned various speakers in the televised General Synod debate on nuclear deterrence in 1983. (He had less to say about the owner of The Mail’s enthusiastic admiration of Hitler back in the 1930s). When I argued with him about the valuable work of the post-war Labour Government he was quick to reply that those politicians were “different”. I very much doubt he said that at the time.

As I commented earlier this year, 2025 marks the 40th anniversary of the publication of Faith in the City, and several small celebrations have been held. Most of us attending the one in Sheffield were north of 60, with Alan Billings, one of the original commissioners and a speaker at the conference, being in his 80s. I wasn’t altogether clear why the event was taking place on the same weekend as General Synod, but perhaps it reflects the Church of England’s limited interest in questions of urban theology and action. More than one speaker noted that in the twenty years after the report there was considerable activity by the CofE in the cities. However, the last 20 years have told a different story.

I was in the middle year of my undergraduate degree, living in Hull, when Faith in the City hit the presses. Alan told us that the Cabinet had leaked the report to the right wing press, enabling its publication to be met with claims of Marxism and a Church failing to attend to its primary task. While many in the Church supported the report, I recall a parishioner in the rural parish where my parents lived asking: “what about the rural areas – where’s the support for us?” I’ve no doubt that those comments were widespread in rural communities.

It felt in the 1980s that the Church of England could still occupy that strange land of “critical solidarity” with the institutions of which it was also a part. Not easy, but it was also the decade in which Archbishop Runcie dared to pray for the dead on both sides at the Falklands Memorial Service in 1982, saying that: “a shared anguish can be a bridge of reconciliation; our neighbours are indeed like us”. Mrs Thatcher was not pleased. In 1984, the Church led by Runcie consecrated David Jenkins as the bishop for Durham. Once again, the Church supplied the right-wing press with oodles of content to bolster its appetite for righteous indignation. My grandfather had gone to glory by that stage but he would have enjoyed the temporal exasperations of the tabloid press.

Looking back is not always a good idea. The seeds of change were already planted in the Church of England of the 1980s. Fewer vocations; difficulties in recruiting to inner-city parishes; a world changing as a rate of knots. However, I’m less certain that those around at the time could have envisaged how radical the changes would become, and the number of parishes that would be forced to merge. The unwinding of Anglicanism’s commitment to provide every church with a parson; a parsonage and burden of finance that could be borne, has happening at a dizzying pace. Volunteers have vanished and the struggle to maintain a meaningful presence has intensified.

It isn’t all doom and gloom. The church I assist at once a month has rallied without any jazzy new initiatives from the centre. Speaking with the organist (a working farmer) he told me that they had got down to an attendance of 10 on a typical Sunday morning. Now it’s at 30. Why? He put it down to the loving pastoral care of a Reader, who made some simple improvements to worship but – perhaps most importantly – helped keep the service at the same time every Sunday. Sometimes it is Morning Prayer and at others, Holy Communion – but the people come nonetheless. In the cities there are also signs of renewed interest in Christianity, with a more diverse population bringing fresh energy to places of worship. The context of Faith in the City has changed – but faith is to be found nonetheless, and the questions raised 40 years ago remain relevant today.

What remains constant, however, is the need for deep listening, authentic presence, recognition of transience and journey, and genuine collaboration. As one of us concluded, “It has to be ‘we’ if we are to make a difference”.

William Temple Foundation blog, 21 May 2025